david benatar's new book also characterizes 'relativism' as if it's exclusively agent-relativism in the chapter 'rejecting relativism', then titles the following chapter after this misinformation 'more plausible competing normative theories', saying 'Normative relativism is one possible, but unpromising, norma-tive theory.' wth is going on???
david benatar's new book also characterizes 'relativism' as if it's exclusively agent-relativism in the chapter 'rejecting relativism', then titles the following chapter after this misinformation 'more plausible competing normative theories', saying 'Normative relativism is one possible, but unpromising, norma-tive theory.' wth is going on???