Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William Klett's avatar

I recently led a meeting on metaethics at my high-school philosophy club and ~90 percent of my peers who had never thought about the issue before had intuitions that aligned with expressivism and/or quasi realism. I then attempted to play devils advocate and make the “torturing babies seems stance independently bad” argument and no one budged. Only one out of around 25 had intuitions that non-naturalism was right. But everyone loved error theory when I brought it up. This has also been consistent with my past experiences.

In my experience moral realism seems is super counterintuitive to everyone who hasn’t been exposed the the questionable methodology of analytic philosophy.

Expand full comment
Eugene Earnshaw's avatar

BB seems like a nice guy and I encourage him in his endeavours, but I feel like his work would benefit from way more editing and more time spent thinking things through. You have much more patience than I do to wade through all the nonsense he threw at the wall in that piece.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts