Archive - Lance Independent

Challenge philosophers who say things are "intuitive" without qualification

A call to stop letting philosophers get away with a bad habit

Jun 19 •

Do You See What I See?

Twitter Tuesday #45

Jun 17 •

Do You Want Other People to Share Your Preferences?

1.0 Overlap in the scope of moral and taste standards

Jun 13 •

God and stance-dependence

Twitter Tuesday #44

Jun 10 •

Further thoughts on Goodhart's Law and the problem of journal centrality in philosophy

Since hiring and career advancement in philosophy depends a great deal on publication in journals, this incentivizes an emphasis on doing philosophy in…

Jun 3 •

May 2025

Most people wouldn't benefit from affirming value realism

1.0 Introduction

May 26 •

The Referee Crisis in Philosophy & Goodhart's Law

If you enjoy this article, please hit the “Like” button (❤️) at the beginning or end of the article.

May 14 •

Huemer is wrong about skepticism (Part 3)

May 14 •

Betting on moral realism & other bad takes

Twitter Tuesday #43

May 13 •

Huemer is wrong about skepticism (Part 2)

May 7 •

Huemer is wrong about skepticism (Full post, Parts 1-4)

May 2 •

April 2025

Huemer is wrong about skepticism (Part 1)

Apr 30 •

#nojs-banner { position: fixed; bottom: 0; left: 0; padding: 16px 16px 16px 32px; width: 100%; box-sizing: border-box; background: red; color: white; font-family: -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 13px; line-height: 13px; } #nojs-banner a { color: inherit; text-decoration: underline; } This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please turn on JavaScript or unblock scripts