Sitemap - 2023 - Lance Independent
Data fraud & the state of academic psychology
Myths about relativism: A response to Nobis
Losing confidence in psychological science
Philosophy isn't about philosophy
Realist pretensions and commonsense thinking
Consciousness & Physicalism with @AnswersInAtheism
Is Peer Review a Big Waste of Time? Discussion with Adam Mastrioanni
Lance's origin story, peer review, and more!
11/2023 Link Post: All Things Meta
Adventures in Super Moorean Land (Part 2)
Adventures in Super Moorean Land (Part 1)
Evolutionary Debunking, Metaphilosophy, & More on @PhilosophyVisualised
Carry on as if nothing (stance-independently) matters
Inspiring philosophy on free will & intuitions (Part 2)
Inspiring philosophy on free will & intuitions (Part 1)
Experimental philosophy & qualitative methods with Kyle Thompson
New article on metaethics and reputation
Review of Inspiring Philosophy's "Moral Realism: Defended" W/ @DannyPhilTalk (Part 2)
Review of Inspiring Philosophy's "Moral Realism: Defended" W/ @DannyPhilTalk (Part 1)
Metaethics & apologetics with @NontraditionalCatholic
Adventures in Super Moorean Land
Illusionism ≠ Consciousness doesn't exist
Is philosophy a waste of time?
We find it obvious that you will be assimilated
Are moral antirealists conceptually impoverished?
Moral realism and the florps that flerp
We need more public philosophy
Theism does not entail realism
Metaethics: Antirealism doesn't require biting any bullets
Intuitions do most of the heavy lifting
Huemer, agent-centered norms, and motivated reasoning
J. P. Andrew: Let's schedule a debate on whether most people are moral realists
Starmans & Friedman on how philosophers think differently than nonphilosophers
J. P. Andrew insists people are moral realists, but empirical data does not support this claim
Taking conceptual impoverishment seriously
Discussing metaethics & pragmatist quietism with Andrew Sepielli
A response to Patrick Flynn on the Trent Horn-Destiny debate
Metaethics: Is moral antirealism evil?
The presumption of folk moral realism must die
Does experimental philosophy discover or manufacture folk philosophical beliefs?
Are there moral judgments? A discussion with David Sackris
J. P. Andrew on moral antirealism and moral outrage
Experimental philosophy: A discussion with Josh Knobe
Metaphilosophy: The Halfway Fallacy (Part 2)
Acting like an error theorist: A response to Oliver Traldi
10 good reasons to take moral realism seriously
Metaphilosophy: The Halfway Fallacy (Part 1)
Perceived loss of purpose or meaning may discourage belief in moral realism
Watkins and the persistent (and probably false) claim that most people are moral realists
Normative entanglement: The linguistic trap at the heart of realist rhetoric
Parfit and the case of missing reasons
There's a new special issue on culture, cognition, and philosophical intuitions
Addressing alobar & Dominik (Part 5)
"Moral realism" is a misleading and tendentious label
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 9 of 9)
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 8 of 9)
Metaphilosophy: Primitive concepts and the liar gambit
Metaethics: Ranking arguments for moral realism with Kane B
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 7 of 9)
Responding to Dominik (Part 3)
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 6 of 9)
Metaphilosophy: The fake cheese fallacy
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 5 of 9)
Discussing moral realism with Don Loeb
Responding to Dominik (Part 2)
Lance Independent has reached 100 posts!
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 4 of 9)
Metaphilosophy: The PhilPapers Fallacy
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 3 of 9)
Criticisms of agent relativism don't refute relativism
Responding to Dominik (Part 1)
Moral antirealism: We can believe error theory
Do only moral realists think ethics "is a thing"? No.
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 2 of 9)
Antirealism as a form of insanity
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Part 1 of 9)
The PhilPapers Fallacy (Series Announcement)
Can moral relativists object to anything?
Moral realism & the problem of motivation
Incorrigibility and the futility of defeaters: Phenomenal conservatism revisited
Expertise and the unintelligibility thesis
Moral antirealists concede too much to moral realists
Generalizing from the armchair: A metaphilosophical critique (Part 2)
Generalizing from the armchair: A metaphilosophical critique (Part 1)
The fake cheese fallacy: Pragmatics and the exploitation of deceptive modifiers
A Critique of Psychophysical Harmony
Self-defeat, cute tricks, and the futility of syllogisms
Incorrigibility and the futility of defeaters
Metaphilosophy and the importance of a critical approach to philosophical methods
Follow up to: William Lane Craig and the conflation between metaethics and normative ethics
William Lane Craig and the conflation between metaethics and normative ethics
There’s no such thing as normative harmony
Revisiting psychophysical harmony: The case against carrots
Qualia and the terminological Möbius strip
Comparing apples to error theory: Alternative antirealist metaethical positions
Generalizing from the armchair
Phenomenal conservatism: An epistemic blank check?
There is no argument for psychophysical harmony (Part 3)
Are most people moral realists?
There is no such thing as psychophysical harmony (Part 2)
There is no such thing as psychophysical harmony (Part 1)
Naturalist moral realism: Discussing metaethics with mon0
Responding to Reasonable Faith Q&A (Part 2)
Normative entanglement: The conflation of metaethics and normative ethics
Responding to Reasonable Faith Q&A (Part 1)
Misrepresenting metaethical relativism
Moral antirealists concede too much to moral realists
What is metaethical pluralism?
It's possible to believe normative error theory
Moral antirealism: Why actions don't require justification
Specific intuitions as support for realism
I started a YouTube channel! Check it out and subscribe!
Response to Mr. Homemaker (Part 1)
Read Mandik's paper on qualia quietism
Three common objections to antirealism, a second response to Philosophy for the People redux
A second round of objections to Philosophy for the People
A short comment on realists claiming that only they think things "really" matter